Oh Diogenes 200Good data could reduce the confusion that often dominates "international policy" discussions. What are the real costs of backhaul and royalties in each country, by far the largest international factors in consumer prices? How much undersea capacity is unused? (I've heard estimates as high as 90%.) These are the issues the International community should be addressing, rather than the unneeded advice and meaningless drivel I hear from the U.S. State Department and so many more.

Comparing data from similar countries is often very helpful. Early in the broadband era, Xavier Niel brought the triple play down to 30 euros in France. I asked German regulator Kurth why were German prices so much higher? It was the right question.

I'm sure there were many other reasons he soon became more aggressive, but the comparison with France helped to light a fire under him.  How does Nigeria compare with Ghana and Kenya in 3G/4G coverage and price? How about Tunisia and Morocco? Or Brazil and Argentina?

Nobel Laureate Gary Becker, a brilliant economist, in 2009 signed off on a Verizon paper that suggested competition was working fairly well, based on an observation that prices had been going down some. Would he have come to the same conclusion if he knew prices in the U.S. were 30% to 75% higher than our peers in France? Was 70% coverage in England acceptable when the U.S. was at 97%? Should rich countries be matching the 90% of Chinese broadband that is gigabit fiber? 

What are the questions you can add to this list? 

What is the landed cost of bandwidth/transit in different countries? 
Africans tell me the international bandwidth/transit cost is the biggest single (international) obstacle to bringing down access prices. The capacity is there and prices have come down. But the prices is still usually 5x-20x higher than most of the U.S. and Europe. Undersea cables add cost, of course, but that only explains a fraction of the difference. The prices resemble what a cartel would charge. But there is no public data.
 
How high are the royalty costs on mobile phones?
I believe royalties are becoming an increasing burden driving up the price. Carlos Slim tells me $50 cellphones are connecting two billion people and are the most powerful tool for expanding access. Bringing down the price of phones makes a big difference. There is a major international debate, led by people like Mark Lemley, about what is a "reasonable" level of royalties. (5-10% seems right to me. Higher than that, especially on low end phones, is a burden.) Again, the public data is extremely limited.
 
What is the actual 3G/4G coverage in each country?
Many countries in the developing world are going to 85-95% coverage. The equipment costs are now so low, most sites everywhere will be upgraded to advanced LTE. Some sooner, some later, but the trend is clear even in the developing world. (This doesn't mean community networks don't have a place, of course.) GSMA is a natural ally on this; what the telcos in the developing world are doing is amazing and historic. Again, very limited data. 
 
What is the actual cost of Internet service in each country?
It's tough to do this accurately, given the many different offering and promotions. But it can be done fairly well. Dave Barden at Merrill Lynch does it regularly for U.S. wireless. I've done it to my satisfaction for the U.S., Canada, France, Germany and England. (U.S./Canada are 30-100% higher.) But I've never seen a reliable comparison between Brazil and Argentina, or Ghana, Kenya, and Nigeria.
 
What are the ten most attractive commercial volume offerings?
Free in France offers 100 gigabytes of LTE for $23/month and landline triple play (some on fiber) for $35. Free is very profitable, paying hundreds of millions every year in income tax. Orange/France Telecom and SFR roughly match those prices. After a rough stretch, each has recently told investors profits are back on track. That's an existence proof for high capacity low cost service. Reliance Jio sells 60 gigabytes for $15.41 and what I would call 10 gigabytes for $4.77. The technology is ready and that should be the goal in other developing countries.
 
Kathy, Mats, Robert, Haolin, Google folks: How do we get someone supported to find this data? 

dave ask

Newsfeed

Vivo is selling new the iQOO 5G premium quality phone for US$536.

Lei Jun Xiaomi "5G to have explosive growth starting from Q2 2020"5G to have explosive growth starting from Q2 2020" I say sooner

Verizon CEO Ronan Dunne: >1/2 VZ 5G "will approximate to a good 4G service" Midband in "low hundreds" Mbps

CFO John Stephens says AT&T is going to cut capex soon.

Bharti in India has lost 45M customers who did not want to pay the minimum USS2/month. It's shutting down 3G to free some spectrum for 4G. It is cutting capex, dangerous when the 12 gigabytes/month of use continues to rise.

Huawei in 16 days sold 1,000,000 5G Mate 20s.  

China has over 50,000 upgraded base stations and may have more than 200,000 by yearend 2019. The growth is astonishing and about to accelerate. China will have more 5G than North America and Europe combined for several years.

5G phone prices are down to $580 in China from Oppo. Headed under $300 in 2020 and driving demand.

No one believed me when I wrote in May, 90% of Huawei U.S. purchases can be rapidly replaced and that Huawei would survive and thrive. Financial results are in, with 23% growth and increased phone sales. It is spending $17B on research in 2019, up > 10%. 

5G phones spotted from Sharp and Sony

NTT DOCOMO will begin "pre-commercial service Sept 20 with over 100 live bases. Officially, the commercial start is 2020.

 More newsfeed

----------

Welcome  1,800,000 Koreans bought 5G in the first four months. The demand is there, and most of the technology works. Meanwhile, the hype is unreal. Time for reporting closer to the truth.

The estimates you hear about 5G costs are wildly exaggerated. Verizon is building the most advanced wireless network while reducing capex. Deutsche Telekom and Orange/France Telecom also confirm they won't raise capex.

Massive MIMO in either 4G or "5G" can increase capacity 3X to 7X, including putting 2.3 GHz to 4.2 GHz to use. Carrier Aggregation, 256 QAM, and other tools double and triple that. Verizon sees cost/bit dropping 40% per year.

Cisco & others see traffic growth slowing to 30%/year or less.  I infer overcapacity almost everywhere.  

Believe it or not, 80+% of 5G (mid-band) for several years will be slower than good 4G, which is more developed.